Invite-only pilot, starting with Alaska court appointees.
S. SETTLEd.
Normalize a file
Raw work. Finished. · For professionals who bill by the hour

Messy work happens.
Finished work gets paid.

Every cycle you export your hours, then lose an evening turning them into whatever form your payer will actually accept. SETTLEd. finishes that part — in your format, with nothing invented — and tracks the money until it arrives.

Your format
not a generic invoice
Offline
works with no signal
Yours
your data, exportable
One example · court appointee drag to compare
Harvest export raw
Entry ID,Date,Project / Matter,Task,Notes,Hours,Rounded,Billable? 880100,2026-08-03,In re M. Harris | 4FA-26-00418PR,Drive Time,travel - facility / 12 mi,0.47,0.50,Yes 880102,2026-08-03,In re M. Harris | 4FA-26-00418PR,Drive Time,travel / 31 mi,1.42,1.50,Yes 880106,2026-08-05,In re M. Harris | 4FA-26-00418PR,Contact,visit with respondent,0.72,0.75,Yes 880107,2026-08-05,In re M. Harris | 4FA-26-00418PR,Contact,follow-up calls,0.22,0.25,Yes 880108,2026-08-06,In re M. Harris | 4FA-26-00418PR,Research,read filings + order,0.93,1.00,Yes 880110,2026-08-06,In re M. Harris | 4FA-26-00418PR,Report Writing,organize notes,1.17,1.25,No ... RAW EXPORT TOTALS Entries,52 Mileage is buried in the notes. Rounding went up, not half up. Nonbillable sits in the same column as billable. Three matters are mixed together. No caption, no case number field, no certification. Summary rows at the bottom break any formula.
Then comes the part nobody pays you for.
Statement of services ready to review
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA
FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT FAIRBANKS
In the Matter of the Protective Proceeding of M. HARRIS
Case No. 4FA-26-00418PR · Three-Year Review
DateActivityHrsAmount
Aug 3Drive Time #8801000.5$42.50
Aug 5Contact #8801060.7$59.50
Aug 5Contact #8801070.2$17.00
Aug 6Research #8801080.9$76.50
Mileage 43 mi recorded$28.81
Total2.3$224.31
1.25 hours of administrative work recorded in the file and excluded from this statement.
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing statement of services is true and correct, that the services described were actually and necessarily performed, and that each line corresponds to a contemporaneous record identified by the source number shown.
One matter, mileage separated, every line traceable.
BEFORE AFTER

Illustrative example built from the real export format and the app's own activity categories. Figures are sample data.

S. SETTLEd.

Raw work.Finished.

Log the hours and the miles as they happen. Get back a document your payer accepts — in their format, with nothing invented.

Use your own export

The tour drives the real normalizer on this page — the same code path your own file takes. Nothing is uploaded either way.

One-hand entry in the field. Works with no signal.
Time, mileage and expenses on one record.
Normalized workbook and statement of services at the end of the cycle.
Your data stays on this device unless you export it.

Every tenth recorded · nothing invented · one file per destination

Who this is for

Different work.
Same unfinished evening.

If you are independent, bill by the hour, and have to reshape your own records into somebody else's format before the money moves, this was built for your problem.

Court reportersAppearance and transcript billing, per court and per agency
Court visitors and GALsStatements of service on appointment, in the court's format
Conservators and guardiansFee petitions with categories a clerk will accept
Court interpretersSession time, travel and minimums, billed per contract
Process serversAttempts, service, mileage, itemised per client's schedule
Expert witnessesReview, deposition and testimony hours, by retainer terms
Freelance paralegalsMatter-based hours for firms with their own intake rules
Independent investigatorsCase hours and expenses under agency requirements

The pilot starts with Alaska court appointees, because that is the format we can verify against real accepted filings today. Every profession above is a template, and templates are added by doing the same homework. Tell us yours and you will get an honest answer about where it sits.

Product

Turn messy work
into what’s next.

Everything needed to get from the work to the money, without rebuilding the same document by hand every cycle.

Field logging

One-handed entry that works with no signal, in the increment your payer bills in — tenths, quarters, or whatever your contract says. Entries hold on the phone and send themselves when signal returns.

Matters and clients

Whoever you work for, whatever they call the file, plus dated rate schedules. A rate change in March never retroactively alters what January billed.

Documents that pass

Your payer's requirements live in the template, not in your memory. If a required field is missing or an activity has no mapping, nothing renders and you are told which entry to fix.

Import what you have

Drop in a Harvest export and watch it split into matters, pull mileage out of your notes, and separate nonbillable work. Your history comes with you instead of starting over.

Payment tracking

Filed, accepted, paid, with ageing. Open the app and know what you are owed and how long it has been sitting, without opening a spreadsheet.

Nothing submits itself

No automated filing, and no software writing your descriptions. You review the document and you send it. Your name is on it and the judgement stays yours.

How it works

From the work to the money in four moves.

The only milestone that counts is your first real submission. If you can log a day's work and produce something your payer accepts without touching it, the rest is detail.

01

Log

Tap the matter, the duration, and what you did. Two taps, twenty seconds, no signal needed.

02

Bring your history

Import an existing export or start clean. Where your old rounding disagrees with your payer's rule, you are shown both and asked.

03

Check, then generate

Every entry is validated against the template first. Anything missing or ambiguous is named, not guessed at.

04

File and track

Export the document, send it yourself, then watch it move through accepted and paid with ageing you can see.

Try it now

Drop in a real export.
Watch it finish.

This is the working normalizer, not a video. Your file is read in this browser and never leaves this device. You will see every row processed, every mileage value recovered from a note, every repeat flagged — and then you can download the statements and the full normalization artifact.

Import

Turn a time export into a document that gets paid.

Drop in the file your time tracker gives you. Nothing is uploaded anywhere — the file is read in this browser and stays on this device.

Drop your export here
.xlsx, .xls or .csv · or click to choose
Sample export loaded. Illustrative records, not a real case file. Drop your own export to replace it.

Before you start

The importer looks for a date, a project or matter, an activity or task, and hours. Rate, billable flag, mileage and notes are used when present. Extra columns are kept in provenance and ignored. Summary and total rows at the bottom of a sheet are stripped rather than treated as entries.
Checking the local processing engines…
Processing

 

Reading the file in this browser. Nothing is uploaded.

0
rows read
0
matters
0
mileage found
0
for review
0.00
billable hours
$0
represented
0
rows stripped
0
duplicates
Event trace
Normalized records0
Normalized

 

Rounding policy

This changes the totals. It is a decision, not a default.

Document details

These appear on the statement. They are not in the export, so they have to come from you.
Rate and mileage
Human release gate

Nothing leaves until you approve it.

Review the mapping, rounding policy, document details, and any rows marked REVIEW. The downloadable release stays locked until you explicitly approve it.
The same release as a machine-readable workbook: normalized rows, the review queue, the field mapping, the processing trace, and the source values preserved unchanged. This is what makes a filing reconstructable a year later.
A full record of what was received, what changed, what is still open, how every column was read, and the processing trace.
Your numbers

Clarity creates capacity.

No averages and no claims. Put in your own figures and see what the unfinished work is costing you.

36
hours a year, unbilled
$3,060
of your time, at your rate
4.5
working days returned

This is time you already spend and cannot bill. It says nothing about what the software costs, because that is being set with the pilot group rather than guessed at beforehand.

Your records

Details build trust.

Your files describe other people's cases, health, finances and disputes. A lot of it is confidential and some of it is sealed. These are the commitments the product is being built to, stated plainly so you can hold us to them.

Isolation enforced in the database — not by an application setting that could be misconfigured, and verified by an automated test that runs on every change.
Minimal on the device — only entries waiting to send are held on your phone, and signing out clears them. A phone left in a car should not become a disclosure.
Invitation only — no open registration, so the people in the system are the people who belong there.
Never used to train anything — case content is not training data, here or anywhere downstream.
Your account, your export — one click, in a format readable without this software. Your billing history is evidence of your own work.

We are not certified against any security framework and will not claim otherwise. If your agency needs a questionnaire answered, ask and you will get honest answers rather than a badge.

Why invite-only

Open signup on a product holding guardianship records is the wrong default. Keeping the pilot small also keeps support answered by the person who built it, which is worth more right now than more users.

Built by

Someone who still does the paperwork.

SETTLEd. was started by Britney Ford, a working court reporter who got tired of exporting her hours and then spending an evening rebuilding them into a document that would actually get paid. She built the first version herself because nothing on the market did the part that took the longest.

That is also why the product refuses to guess. When you are the one signing the submission, software inventing a number on your behalf is not a feature.

BF
Britney Ford
Founder · working court reporter

Why it starts narrow

A template is only trustworthy once it has been checked against submissions a payer actually accepted. That is real work per profession and per jurisdiction, and it cannot be faked. So the pilot starts with one group, gets it exactly right, and expands from evidence rather than ambition.

What we will not do

No writing your narratives. No inferring a number that was never recorded. No submitting anything on your behalf. Those are not missing features; they are the boundary that makes the rest of it safe to rely on.

Pricing

One plan. No games.

Billed to you, not to your client. No per-document fees, no seat minimums, and no free tier that pays for itself some other way.

Professional
Set with the pilot group

A flat monthly subscription per person. The rate is being decided with the first cohort against what it actually saves them, rather than guessed at now and revised later.

Unlimited cases and filings
Every template your work needs
Import from Harvest or CSV
Payment tracking with ageing
Support from the person who built it
One-click export, any time
Not included, on purpose.
No per-document charges, ever — nothing that makes you hesitate before generating a filing. No advertising. No resale of anything.
Request pilot access

Why no free tier

A free tier has to be paid for somehow, and the usual answers are advertising, data, or volume. None of those belong near guardianship records. One paid plan means the product can be boring about security and particular about filings.

Pause instead of cancel

Appointments come and go. A paused account keeps your records searchable at a reduced rate rather than forcing you to export and start over when the next one arrives.

Questions

Reasonable things to ask.

Rounding, retention, rejected filings, other states, export, and what happens to your words.

Does it write my case narratives?
No, and it will not. You certify under penalty of perjury that your statement is true and correct. Software should not be putting words into a document you swear to. Formatting gets cleaned up and abbreviations you define get expanded. Your descriptions stay yours.
How does the rounding work?
Tenths of an hour, half up, matching the rule the app already applies. Every entry keeps the raw duration alongside the rounded one, so a line can always be traced back. If your court requires quarter hours instead, that becomes the rule for your template rather than an argument.
What happens when something is missing?
It stays missing. Mileage that was never written down is not estimated, a missing case number is not inferred, and an unmapped activity is not assigned a best guess. The entry goes to a review list naming exactly what it needs, and nothing renders until it is resolved.
What if a filing gets rejected?
You tell us, we find out why, and the template is corrected. Regenerating costs nothing because there are no per-document fees. Each template also records when it was last checked against a filing a court actually accepted, so a stale one is flagged rather than quietly used.
Is this affiliated with a court or agency?
No. SETTLEd. is an independent product with no relationship to any court, court system, agency, or appointing authority. It helps you prepare a document. Sending it, and being right about it, remains entirely yours.
I'm not a court appointee. Does this work for me?
Only once your format exists as a verified template. The pilot begins with Alaska court appointees because that is what can be checked against real accepted submissions today. Court reporters, interpreters, process servers, expert witnesses and freelance paralegals are all the same shape of problem and all on the list. Tell us your profession and your payer's requirements and you will get an honest answer about where it sits, not a sales answer.
Who owns the data, and can I get it out?
You do, and yes, at any time, in a format readable without this software. Your billing history is evidence of your own work. Holding it hostage would be a strange way to earn the trust this product depends on.
Do you submit it for me?
No. The product generates the document; you review it and send it yourself. Automated submission is not on the roadmap, because the person certifying a document should be the person sending it.
Invite-only pilot

Start with one real cycle.

If you bill by the hour, reformat your own records to get paid, and would try this on one genuine cycle, get in touch. Tell us your profession and your format. Honest feedback is worth more right now than more users.

Request an invite

Tell us what you do and what takes you longest. You will get a real reply from a person.

Normalize a real file

Pilot is limited so support stays personal.

Filler agentstand-in narrator
First time here? Two minutes, narrated.